The conflict between Infiniteria and Scandinavian Enviro Systems continues to escalate with news emerging that Infiniteria Sweden AB and Infiniteria Europe Sàrl (jointly “Infiniteria”) is filing a request with the Gothernburg District Court for the immediate termination of Enviro’s ongoing company reorganisation. In a press release published by Scandinavian Enviro Systems, the Swedish Technology Company stated that, “Infiniteria disputes the validity of Enviro’s terminations of the agreements governing the joint venture with Infiniteria and announces damages claims in connection therewith.”
Infiniteria Disputes Restructuring and JV Terminations
As we have reported in Tyre & Rubber Recycling, Scandinavian Enviro Systems applied for Company Reorganization with the Gothernburg District Court on 26 February 2026, which was then approved on 27 February 2026 by the Gothernburg District Court for a period of 3 months. On March 20 2026, Scandinavian Enviro Systems terminated their agreements with Infiniteria Europe Sàrl and Cuibhil Luxco regarding the collaboration related to the joint venture within the framework of their Company Reorganization and with the support of Chapter 3, Section 9 of the Swedish Company Reorganization Act.
The latest development sees Infiniteria requesting to end the Company Reorganization procedure with immediate effect. In the statement by Scandinavian Enviro Systems, the Swedish technology company laid out Infiniteria’s principal argument for ending their Reorganization:
Infiniteria’s principal grounds are that the purpose of the reorganization cannot be expected to be achieved and that it would be inequitable towards Infiniteria to allow the reorganization to continue. In addition, Infiniteria has indicated its intention to vote against any reorganization plan proposed by Enviro.
The submissions crucially also include information that Infiniteria is disputing the validity of Enviro’s terminations of the agreements covering the joint venture, as well as a preliminarily claim for damages from the terminations which amount to EUR 84 million. The key passage from Enviro’s statement reads:
The information further includes that Infiniteria disputes the validity of Enviro’s terminations of the agreements governing the joint venture with Infiniteria. The terminations were carried out on 20 March 2026 pursuant to Chapter 3, Section 9 of the Swedish Company Reorganization Act. Infiniteria further states that damages claims arising from the terminations, which have not yet been finally calculated, are preliminarily assessed as potentially amounting to a total of approximately EUR 84 million. The calculations partially overlap with the claim brought against Enviro in the ongoing arbitration proceedings that Enviro communicated about on 6 February 2026. No formal damages claim in connection with the terminations has to date been brought against Enviro.
Timing is crucial and contextually it matters in this dispute. At the time of publication, Scandinavian Enviro System’s Company Reorganization is due to elapse on 27 May 2026. On top of this, the notice period for the termination agreement of the JV period is also three months. Although Enviro’s statement relating to the termination of the JV was on March 20, 2026, however it doesn’t confirm when Infiniteria Europe Sàrl and Cuibhil Luxco were officially notified. We can though safely assume that at the latest this notice period ends on is June 20, 2026. After that date and potentially in the days preceding this date, Enviro will be free to sell their technology to anyone else in Europe, as well as having access to the services that the joint venture has benefitted from.
If Infiniteria are successful in convincing the Court of Gothernburg to terminate the Company Reorganization, then it is possible that the contracts would revert back into place and keep Enviro as a part of the Joint Venture. The attention would then turn to the arbitration dispute originally submitted by Infiniteria.
In response to Infiniteria’s position, Enviro stated:
Enviro strongly disagrees with Infiniteria’s position. The Company considers that Infiniteria’s assessment is based on incomplete and incorrect assumptions, leading to conclusions that Enviro considers to be unfounded and that Enviro strongly disagrees with.
The Company is currently evaluating the information received together with its advisors and the court-appointed reorganization administrator, and intends to respond to Infiniteria’s claims in accordance with the instructions of the District Court.
